Skip to main content

Social Media Myths Revealed

I had an interesting email conversation with a marketing manager today about social media marketing.

The conversation was interesting because it revealed some the myths that marketing people have about social media. But that also got me thinking to how such myths can be overcome to give more positive results in social media marketing.

Myth 1: User generated means user will generate content

If you create a social media platform for the social, don’t expect that users to automatically generate content to an extend “that it becomes a movement by itself”.

Every movement needs a leader and social media is no different.

Without a leader, users will get just go around aimlessly until it does not make sense to be part of this social platform anymore.

Forums still require moderators. Online communities exist because of community leaders.

Hence, if you start a social media platform for your users, you need a leader to lead the interaction.

Mind you, it is not pushing about pushing the message.

Myth 2: Users like to talk to make believe accounts

Creating a dummy account solves the problem of what if that person fronting this leaves.

However, that creates a bigger problem.

Human beings are in nature social animals. Even in an online environment, you rather still talk to another human.

You read this blog because you know its a human writing it and I am communication with you.

You play a MMORPG to interact with other humans than to play against a machine.

Hence, the possibility of that face leaving the company is there, but it is only human to want to take to a human face.

Myth 3: Social media is about ah hoc content

I am starting to learn that this isn’t true. You can still take some of traditional print practices to a part of social media.

Create an editorial calendar. Plan what you are going to do per week minimum.

For example, if you run a Facebook Fan Page, create a calendar that prepares you for the activity online.

This week could be about promoting a product. Scour the web for blogs commenting about this product.

If there are comments, reply. Replying shows the commenter that you read his/her comments.

The other week could be a contest. Hence, you can plan a week before to get the prize of the content and mechanics reader for the competition.

I guess the biggest problem is most focus on the media of social media.

I feel that the focus should be on the social part, social = interaction.

It is about why you want to interact and not how your interaction gets thru.

Comments

I think the term "Social Media" is cringe worthy and fundamentally wrong.
Unknown said…
Content creation isn't that easily embraced by the bulk of social media users. Most prefer to read and share what they have read through channels like Facebook, Twitter's Retweets, email lists and others - if they bother to do so in the first place.

I like your point about inculcating some discipline in the editorial process. One needs to have a certain rhythm in order to keep up a visible presence in the digital world. While blogging and facebooking is sometimes a serendipitous and idiosyncratic exercise - according to one's whims and fancies - succeeding in them is the outcome of hard work and diligence.

In the words of Thomas Edison, "Genius is one percent inspiration and ninety nine percent perspiration."
Aaron Koh said…
@Isabelle. True. It was once called Web2.0 then New Media. Now it is Social Media. For me, it is how a brand should interact with their consumers who now have a free medium to air their views but also with their readers.

@Cool Insider. I used to discourage corporates to blog because of the serendipitous and idiosyncratic perception it gives.

But I start to realised that blogs, fanpage, etc are still media and with media, you need to put in a plan which the entire team can follow.

Popular posts from this blog

Will mrbrown's post on Mr Tan Kin Lian's thermometer app "misadventure" promote technology ageism?

I am not ashamed to say I support Mr Tan Kin Lian as a presidential candidate because I believed in what he stood for. And when Mr Tan posted his "misadventure" with a thermometer app, I did shake my head in disbelief that he did that. Source:   http://www.mrbrown.com/blog/2013/07/we-could-have-had-him-for-president.html Thinking twice, there could be a possibility that Mr Tan misunderstood how this app work. Most  thermometer app take data from various weather stations to display the temperature on it. Yes, the technology savvy will do a #facepalm when they read the post and mrbrown's post demonstrated it perfectly. Wrote mrbrown , "Maybe the former Presidential-hopeful didn't realize he needed to upgrade to the Pro version of the app. Then his iPhone would not only measure temperature, it would also measure current PSI (PM2.5 included), tell you if you are having your period, and cook instant noodles. Good thing he didn't try to measure boil

How UOB's Paper Trail Amplifies IT Greatest Security Threat

UOB required you to do everything on paper. If you want to change your mobile number for your banking account with them or for your credit card, you need to fill up a form. Yet, this paper trail represented a potential security fail for the bank - Human Error. So a bitcoin expert walked into UOB to open a bank account. The bank employee had to print a form from a online pdf document to fill in this bitcoin expert's particulars. When it came to entering the bitcoin expert's email, that's when the forgotten art of handwriting was the most obvious of the digital generation. Wrote Robert Capodieci, My name is Roberto Capodieci, as most of you know. and my email address is very obvious to decode. It is not a p4l_l337_s0u1@gmail.com, but it is a more obvious roberto@capodieci.com, thing that, right after reading my name in the same form, should come out easy. Still, a data entry personnel of the UOB bank (or of a service provider the UOB bank uses) entered it as roberto

NEL Train Fault Shouts Lack Of Crisis Communication

The North-East Line train fault of 11 April 2018 was my virgin experience of a rush hour train fault since I moved to Punggol. One would have thought that with the number of train faults experienced by the North-East Line operator, SBS Transit, they would have improved the communications and handling of train faults. However, my personal experience told another story. First, there were no announcements at the Punggol LRT stations of the train fault even though SBS Transit manages them. The train fault was reported as early as 7.10am as I had a friend who was also stuck in the train. I boarded the LRT at Coral Edge around 7.30am and I didn't hear of any announcement nor was there any signage to inform me o the train fault at Punggol Station. Second, the announcement kept saying that there would be a 15 minutes delay, but 15 minutes passed and the trains, on both side, wasn't moving. If the announcement would be more frank to say it will be a longer delay, commuters would