Skip to main content

Are SG telcos giving subscribers mobile phone numbers to premium partners?

Facebook has come under fire for privacy related issues. But it seems an unsolicited sms from one of the telco’s premium partner got a subscriber concerned about the privacy of his mobile number

A Mr Ang wrote on Starhub Facebook Page that he was shocked to receive an unsolicited sms from eFusion reminding him that a premium sms service will be renewed for $20 if he didn’t send an sms back to to stop the service.

Mr Ang first called Starhub hotline and they told him to call eFusion. When he tried the eFusion number, it was a non-working number. Further calls to Starhub only led to more confusion.

Wrote Mr Ang on Starhub Facebook Page,

1. why am I getting this sms when I got no dealing wtih eFusion ?

2. I was told by Starhub CSC that their Premium Partner like eFusion has all the subscribers' phone numbers from Starhub. Why is this so and how is Starhub protecting our privacy ?

3. how is Starhub ensuring that their Premium Partners do not anyhow bill their subscriber, especially using unethical reminder to automatically renewing service?

4. is Starhub ensuring that all its Premium Partners identify themselves clearly on their sms, the service that is being provided and also add working office number for clarification instead of the agonising time-wasting process of going through 1633?

Point number 2 sounds rather disturbing as it seems that Starhub is sharing or “selling” mobile phone numbers of subscribers to Premium Partners. This means any Starhub mobile user could contact you for telemarketing purposes.

Is this explanation a mistake on the part of Starhub’s CSC? If it is true, are there any options to opt out of this? Are there any SLAs between Starhub and their premium partners to ensure that this is not abused?

Are the other two telcos, M1 and Singtel, also practising this? Do they have options for their subscribers opting out of it?

To readers, are you concern about the telcos giving away mobile numbers to premium partners? If you are, please comment below.

Labels:

Comments

Unknown said…
I am with M1 for 9 years. Reading these kind of story, it seems I am spared from the 3rd party provider.

I am not sure about other M1 customers, though.
One thing I do, I only deal with M1 shop directly. I learned enough not to go to any authorised dealer anymore.
October 26, 2010 at 6:12 PM
Aaron Koh said…
Hi Zhong,

The premium partners refer to other service providers that Starhub works with such as eFusion.

You are right though. It could be better to go to the vendor directly.
October 26, 2010 at 7:03 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Singapore radio personality in "hot soup" for reporting train delays based on Tweets?

Update - Hossan Leong has commented on this post to say " I'm not in trouble pls don't blow this out of proportion. Let it rest. It's getting silly. Thank you for your love and concern and I apologize for any misunderstanding." ~  Hossan Leong. Hossan Leong, a Singapore radio personality for The Gold Breakfast Show on Gold 90.5, was censured today for reporting on train delays on the Circle Line because he based the information on Tweets, rather than waiting for the official reports from the Circle Line operator, SMRT.  It is, however, unknown if the "warning" came from Mediacorp producers or SMRT. Tweeted Hossan Leong ,  OK...I reported it on air and now I'm getting into trouble for it?? The CC line is DOWN rite? I did nothing wrong rite? The SMRT Circle Line was reported to be down this morning during peak hours and started as early as 7am. However, local news only received official statement was received by the mainstream media at about 9...
14 comments
Read more

DBS Bank – One Tweet too little too late.

(Updated post - DBS apologise with the 3Rs – Will social media bite? ) It was the bluest Monday for DBS/POS Bank in its entire banking history when more than 1000 of their ATM and online banking services were taken offline due to a software upgrade an outage (PR announced that it was down due to software upgrade, but the outsourcer, IBM, later claimed it was an outage). So on that Monday, DBS decided to sign up onto Twitter and post a 140 characters one-liner onto Twitter to post a one liner to inform the Twitterverse of the down time. Everybody knows that if you just create a new account on Twitter, you would start off with 0 friends. How would you be able to inform the Twitterverse if you start with 0 friends? DBS Bank did something smart to insert the #dbs and #posb and that probably drew some attention to this account. However, the effectiveness of the tweet was lacking as it drew only 28 retweets. As of this posting, DBS Bank attracted 274 followers. A letter to T...
9 comments
Read more

New field in SocialPR: Social Media Crisis Communications

I have been busy with family for the Lunar New Year week but it seem the Singapore blog-o-sphere was active, and is still is, about recently formed Association of Bloggers (Singapore), ABS for short. To cut a long story short, the announcement of ABS via mainstream media didn’t go down well with Singapore bloggers and in the end resulted in some speculation to why ABS was set-up in the first place. A post by the ABS president defending herself against a harsh criticism from a blogger added to the bad start and created even more speculation that ABS was set-up with an ulterior motive. A week later, some founding members of the pro-team started posting up notice of resignation on their blogs and this just added fuel to fire. Again, a story of ABS appeared in mainstream media and this lead to even more disgruntled bloggers asking why the president isn’t responding via her blog or the association’s blog. I also responded to a post about the ABS incident. You can catch a summary of...
6 comments
Read more