Skip to main content

Respond to the "right" issues to improve your brand imageght

As of this posting, several bloggers are in uproar against Nuffnang for banning Sisuahlai for a post with an image that the web2.0 advertising agency feel maybe be defaming them.

Going through Sisuahlai's blog post, it seem like Nuffnang was responding to the wrong issue followed by the wrong actions. The consequence of it was the negative responses it got from fellow bloggers.

Sisuahlai has taken down the post which included Nuffnang's reason for banning him. Cached post showed that Nuffnang wasn't happy with the image of the evolution of mankind that ended with the fading of the image to a bank robber.

Nuffnang responded by banning Sisuahlai for two months.

This made Nuffnang looked heavy handed and created a perception for the web2.0 agency only allows members who say good things about them and ban members who are critical about them.

From the initial post, Sisuahlai asked if the 30 (Nuffnang)/70 (bloggers) division of ad revenue fair to participating bloggers.

Ironically, Nuffnang responded to Sisuahlai but it was the banning because of the image that overshadowed it.

Wrote Nuffnang,
To finally address your concern, Nuffnang remains a private company and we will not disclose our operating cost and or give more details plans of our payout structure as this information can and will be used by a competitors against us.
As a company and private entity, Nuffnang has the right to say no.

But as Web2.0 company, responding via Nuffnang blog or a comment on Sisuahlai's blog was expected.

Furthermore, Nuffnang could have explained that it felt disturbed by the "evolution of man" banner created by Sisuahlai and might cause many to misinterpret the image that it seem like Nuffnang was being positioned as a robber.

This could have been done with an entry in Nuffnang's blog, but it seems the blog is only used for advertising its clients or themselves.

An email respond, with a confidentiality clause, made Nuffnang seem very Web1.0.

Banning Sisuahlai made Nuffnang look very heavy handed, pre-Web1.0.

Wasn't Web2.0 all about bringing the corporation closer to their buyers?


Popular posts from this blog

Why is Ramly Burger banned in Singapore?

Yahoo Singapore ran an article of the Ramly Burger by highlighting that it is ban in Singapore.

Yet, the writer from Makansutra failed to address the most important issue of why the Ramly meat patty is banned in Singapore.

A search online easily did highlight that the famous Malaysian meat patty is banned by the AVA but didn't go into details.

Wrote Arlina Arshad for The Straits Times in January 2004,

"But the importing of beef and beef products from Malaysia is not permitted, said theAgri-Food and Veterinary Authority (AVA).

Selling and supplying them without a permit is also an offence, and offenders can befined as much as $50,000 or jailed two years, or both, said the AVA."

In May of the same year, another article highlighted that a man was even charged in court for "smuggling" the Ramly burger in 2004.

"The AVA said that meat products processed in Malaysian food factories which it had notapproved were banned here.Suzali was yesterday jailed for four month…

Did She Run Or Did She "Just Fake It" For Adidas?

Andrea Chong, a Adidas appointed influencer, posted a photo of herself in the middle of the Standard Chartered Singapore Marathon 2015 and captioned how she was "all smiles" during the run.

Unfortunately for Andrea or the PR agency, one of her readers checked her bib number #75148  at the Marathon's website only to find it to belonging to somebody else.

That somebody else is Kuvin Kuar, a intern at Edelman PR and the bib number had a status "DNF" or did not finished.

This raised the first red flag as one of the rules stated that "A Participants is strictly not allowed to transfer his or her race entry to another party".

This cascaded into perceptions that Andrea herself did not even start or complete the race and was only "planted" by Adidas or the PR agency, Edelman PR, to look pretty in the marathon.

Marketing Magazine noted that Adidas declined to comment about the incident which lead to further speculation that Andrea was possibly just …

Kudos To Huawei 2 Year Warranty For P9 Series

When it comes to smartphones, I think I am jinxed.

For my history of owning smartphones, every time it comes close to the end of the two year contract with my mobile service provider. This time round, it happened to my Huawei P9.

All of a sudden, the LCD screen sort of decolourised. I thought it was a temporary issue but the decolourisation lasted for a few hours. Then the nightmare began.

The touchscreen couldn't be touched. This made it the smartphone a brick.

I thought the Huawei P9 only had one year of warrant. With my contract ending in mid-year, I thought I would have to wait it out till the contract ended and allowed me to buy a new phone under a contract.

Luckily, a friend reminded me that the phone came with a 2 year warranty.

So I decided to go to the Huawei service center, right smack in the center of the city, to see if my phone is under warranty and if Huawei would honour their 2 year warranty.

Thankfully, Huawei isn't as popular as the Samsungs or Apples, and the …