Skip to main content

Social Thoughts for Dec 18 2008: Death to the embargo

Techcrunch is declared to PR agencies that it either an exclusive or death to the embargo.

Their reason being that other website publications are choosing to break the embargo to be first with the news and thus providing no advantage to Techcrunch.

Embargos in Asia are well respected though, probably because embargoes are often given to print publications.

To the non-media/PR trained, an embargoed press release or interview means that journalist will be receiving the information days prior to a date in the future that the client decides to announce to the public.

Embargos are good for journalists because it gives them time to research and prepare for the article before the date of the official announcement.

However, Techcrunch’s announcement shows another divide in the Media/PR relationship: Media looking for the exclusive so that they can be first with the news while PR looks out for the quantity of the coverage rather than the quality of it to meet the deliverables as promised to the client earlier.

This also highlights the print vs online battle. Print do not have Google search or Google news to deal with, online has.

If you are site A and you are first with the news, would you go to site B to read the same thing?


Techcrunch: Death To The Embargo
PR2.0: TechCrunch Kills The Embargo, But PR Holds the Smoking Gun
Glasshouse: Techcrunch and PR
Debate on Mahalo: What do you think of Michael Arrington of TechCrunch promising to break every embargo he gets?

If you are PR or media and have a blog post on this issue, please enter them in the comments below and I will put them on the main post. 


J1 said…
Of course print has Google news to deal with. Print competes for attention with online. The issue is whether print can generate unique content through unique interviews - if it can, then that differentiates it from news aggregation services.
Aaron Koh said…
@J1 totally agree with you.

The problem is most embargoed news comes in the form of a press release not an interview.

Unless the spokesperson decides it makes sense to work exclusively with a single publication, but usually they rather see mass coverage.

Popular posts from this blog

Why is Ramly Burger banned in Singapore?

Yahoo Singapore ran an article of the Ramly Burger by highlighting that it is ban in Singapore.

Yet, the writer from Makansutra failed to address the most important issue of why the Ramly meat patty is banned in Singapore.

A search online easily did highlight that the famous Malaysian meat patty is banned by the AVA but didn't go into details.

Wrote Arlina Arshad for The Straits Times in January 2004,

"But the importing of beef and beef products from Malaysia is not permitted, said theAgri-Food and Veterinary Authority (AVA).

Selling and supplying them without a permit is also an offence, and offenders can befined as much as $50,000 or jailed two years, or both, said the AVA."

In May of the same year, another article highlighted that a man was even charged in court for "smuggling" the Ramly burger in 2004.

"The AVA said that meat products processed in Malaysian food factories which it had notapproved were banned here.Suzali was yesterday jailed for four month…

Those Who Gamble Online Have Poorest Control - NCG Survey In 2012

Singapore will soon exempt local operators, Singapore Pools and Turf Club, from online gambling ban and the sites will be ready in November 2016.

Ministry of Home Affairs explained that a complete ban on remote gambling drives demand and activities underground, and may create larger incentives for criminal syndicates to target Singapore."

Yet in a 2012 survey by the National Council on Problem Gambling (NCG) found that those who gamble online have the poorest control.

For those who indulged in online gambling, 30.4% said they gambled for a longer period than they planned to, 33.3% gambled with more money than they planned and 29.2% gambled more frequently they planned to. 
Will launching the online gambling sites be like opening a Pandora Box that will create more issues in the future?

A Very Small Chicken Or An Oversized Popcorn Chicken?

Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC) Singapore Facebook Page recently received a complaint of the size of the chicken being served at KFC.

Barnabas Ng took a photo of his chicken from KFC which showed it to be almost the size of the KFC small container. It also looked like a an oversize popcorn chicken.

Wrote Barnabas,

"Hi KFC, is this your new standard size for a chicken? I order 3 piece meal and 2 pieces including this so called original recipe chicken is smaller than the size of the cap of ur small mash potato.

Have you guys try to cut cost so much that you are offering half a size chicken pieces for a full price meal? It is just getting from bad to worse"

KFC Singapore did reply to Barnabas for him to PM his mobile number but Barnabas has yet to receive any calls from KFC Singapore, as of this posting.

Maybe chickens are also shrinking with the current climate change?