Skip to main content

Food blog "chop suey”

Another day in the blog-o-sphere and a food blog was asked by the cafe to remove the “negative” post about their cafe.

Kaelyn Ong was asked to take down her blog post of the cafe or else legal actions will follow.

The story took on the Streisand Effect with the local newspapers reporting about it and bloggers posting their views about the legal threat.

After this story, I believed some companies out there are worried about dealing with bloggers. Actually, this case should be an example on how you don’t deal with a negative review. But how should you deal with a negative review?

Here are some tips.

Address the issue, not the blogger

When you threaten the blogger to pull down the post with legal action, you are reacting to the blogger and not the issue at hand.

In this case here, the blogger commented about the cakes and food at the cafe. Was there something that the cafe could have improved on? Was the Nikita cake really too dry for that day’s serving?

The cafe has the right to respond but remember to address the issue, not the blogger.

Count to 10 before responding

Sounds like an anger management tip, but I wouldn’t be surprise if the cafe owner would be angry over the review. But the best thing to do is to count to 10 before responding.

Better, go sleep over the problem and look to address it the next day.

Print media like blogger stories, especially about companies suing them

If your choice of moving forward is to take legal action against the blogger, make sure you prepare yourself the blogger is going to blog about you suing the blogger and the press will soon get wind of it and choose to write a story about it.

Readership at traditional media maybe dying, but they still have the numbers to have an effect. The issue will no longer just be bounded within the traditional media as there will be bloggers who will cut and paste the article and put it up online and post a comment in favour of the affect blogger.

Practise good customer service in dealing bloggers

Not all your customers are bloggers, but almost all bloggers can be your customers. Hence it is important for you as a company to practise the same good customer service you would with your real customers.

I still remember that when I ordered fish and chips at Geek Terminal then, my fish was served uncooked and they replace it immediately and offered a free meal. That’s good customer service.

What if Geek Terminal didn’t offer the replacement? Would I sue them, of course not. I would have paid up and not return anymore.

Threatening legal action against the blogger is bad customer service but engaging them is good customer service.

The cafe here in question should have email the blogger back to the cafe for a free tasting session to explain for the bad servings that day. Maybe take this opportunity to get more feedback from the blogger.

I won’t be surprised if the blogger would blog positively about the cafe’s good customer service in dealing with bloggers.

Bloggers are actually nice people

Bloggers are not are scary as they seem. In inviting bloggers to event, I find bloggers to be very friendly and nice.

If they cannot attend an event, they would reply nicely. I have also work with bloggers where they work closely with the brand rather than against the brand.

Managing bloggers’ expectations is also important. Be open and transparent with the blogger. If you don’t know the answer and need to get back to the blogger, say you don’t know. One should also be upfront of the details too rather than try to hide to save one from embarrassment.

I wondered what would have been the respond if the cafe chose to engage the blogger instead of threatening with legal action?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why is Ramly Burger banned in Singapore?

Yahoo Singapore ran an article of the Ramly Burger by highlighting that it is ban in Singapore.

Yet, the writer from Makansutra failed to address the most important issue of why the Ramly meat patty is banned in Singapore.

A search online easily did highlight that the famous Malaysian meat patty is banned by the AVA but didn't go into details.

Wrote Arlina Arshad for The Straits Times in January 2004,

"But the importing of beef and beef products from Malaysia is not permitted, said theAgri-Food and Veterinary Authority (AVA).

Selling and supplying them without a permit is also an offence, and offenders can befined as much as $50,000 or jailed two years, or both, said the AVA."

In May of the same year, another article highlighted that a man was even charged in court for "smuggling" the Ramly burger in 2004.


"The AVA said that meat products processed in Malaysian food factories which it had notapproved were banned here.Suzali was yesterday jailed for four month…

Did She Run Or Did She "Just Fake It" For Adidas?

Andrea Chong, a Adidas appointed influencer, posted a photo of herself in the middle of the Standard Chartered Singapore Marathon 2015 and captioned how she was "all smiles" during the run.

Unfortunately for Andrea or the PR agency, one of her readers checked her bib number #75148  at the Marathon's website only to find it to belonging to somebody else.

That somebody else is Kuvin Kuar, a intern at Edelman PR and the bib number had a status "DNF" or did not finished.

This raised the first red flag as one of the rules stated that "A Participants is strictly not allowed to transfer his or her race entry to another party".

This cascaded into perceptions that Andrea herself did not even start or complete the race and was only "planted" by Adidas or the PR agency, Edelman PR, to look pretty in the marathon.

Marketing Magazine noted that Adidas declined to comment about the incident which lead to further speculation that Andrea was possibly just …

Kudos To Huawei 2 Year Warranty For P9 Series

When it comes to smartphones, I think I am jinxed.

For my history of owning smartphones, every time it comes close to the end of the two year contract with my mobile service provider. This time round, it happened to my Huawei P9.

All of a sudden, the LCD screen sort of decolourised. I thought it was a temporary issue but the decolourisation lasted for a few hours. Then the nightmare began.

The touchscreen couldn't be touched. This made it the smartphone a brick.

I thought the Huawei P9 only had one year of warrant. With my contract ending in mid-year, I thought I would have to wait it out till the contract ended and allowed me to buy a new phone under a contract.

Luckily, a friend reminded me that the phone came with a 2 year warranty.

So I decided to go to the Huawei service center, right smack in the center of the city, to see if my phone is under warranty and if Huawei would honour their 2 year warranty.

Thankfully, Huawei isn't as popular as the Samsungs or Apples, and the …