Skip to main content

4 basic rules of blogger engagement

Jay Baer of Convince & Convert wrote an interesting post about the differences between bloggers and reporters.

His post can be found here but the main points can be found here. My comments can be found below.

  • Bloggers are self-made
    Social PR: Most of the bloggers here started their blog from 0 readers to a few hundreds to thousands over the years.

    They create content that are of interest to them not because the brands tell them that it is important to write about them.
  • Bloggers are time-starved
    Social PR: Many PR agencies often in the name of cost savings would like to combine their press conference to get bloggers in during the day.

    Unfortunately, most bloggers have a day job and are often unable to attend during the day.

    So it is important to understand this time factor.
  • Bloggers need traffic and influence
    Social PR: Most of the blogger engagement in Singapore can be summarized in two activities, press releases and events.

    However, most agencies fail to ask themselves how does this relate to more traffic and influence for the bloggers.

    Usually after the event, most agencies would just do a clipping report and send it to their client. That benefits the client but how does it benefit the blogger?

    Agencies should repost the bloggers’ posts on their website or the brand’s website.

    In engaging bloggers, besides just providing content, the agencies should look at they also bring traffic and influence to the bloggers.
  • Bloggers want to co-create content with you
    Social PR: Again, this is an area where most agencies fail and taken the “this is my client’s content and please post about it”.

    The current interviews that I have conducted with bloggers showed that they are willing to participate as it is co-create content with me.

    In return, I link them back and this not only bring readers to their blog, but also increase one more linkback to their site. Linkback is important part of improving their pagerank.


LEon said…
Thanks for sharing the four pointers for handling the bloggers and I agree that make perfect sense.

Popular posts from this blog

Why is Ramly Burger banned in Singapore?

Yahoo Singapore ran an article of the Ramly Burger by highlighting that it is ban in Singapore.

Yet, the writer from Makansutra failed to address the most important issue of why the Ramly meat patty is banned in Singapore.

A search online easily did highlight that the famous Malaysian meat patty is banned by the AVA but didn't go into details.

Wrote Arlina Arshad for The Straits Times in January 2004,

"But the importing of beef and beef products from Malaysia is not permitted, said theAgri-Food and Veterinary Authority (AVA).

Selling and supplying them without a permit is also an offence, and offenders can befined as much as $50,000 or jailed two years, or both, said the AVA."

In May of the same year, another article highlighted that a man was even charged in court for "smuggling" the Ramly burger in 2004.

"The AVA said that meat products processed in Malaysian food factories which it had notapproved were banned here.Suzali was yesterday jailed for four month…

Those Who Gamble Online Have Poorest Control - NCG Survey In 2012

Singapore will soon exempt local operators, Singapore Pools and Turf Club, from online gambling ban and the sites will be ready in November 2016.

Ministry of Home Affairs explained that a complete ban on remote gambling drives demand and activities underground, and may create larger incentives for criminal syndicates to target Singapore."

Yet in a 2012 survey by the National Council on Problem Gambling (NCG) found that those who gamble online have the poorest control.

For those who indulged in online gambling, 30.4% said they gambled for a longer period than they planned to, 33.3% gambled with more money than they planned and 29.2% gambled more frequently they planned to. 
Will launching the online gambling sites be like opening a Pandora Box that will create more issues in the future?

A Very Small Chicken Or An Oversized Popcorn Chicken?

Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC) Singapore Facebook Page recently received a complaint of the size of the chicken being served at KFC.

Barnabas Ng took a photo of his chicken from KFC which showed it to be almost the size of the KFC small container. It also looked like a an oversize popcorn chicken.

Wrote Barnabas,

"Hi KFC, is this your new standard size for a chicken? I order 3 piece meal and 2 pieces including this so called original recipe chicken is smaller than the size of the cap of ur small mash potato.

Have you guys try to cut cost so much that you are offering half a size chicken pieces for a full price meal? It is just getting from bad to worse"

KFC Singapore did reply to Barnabas for him to PM his mobile number but Barnabas has yet to receive any calls from KFC Singapore, as of this posting.

Maybe chickens are also shrinking with the current climate change?