Skip to main content

Daily average SPH newspapers circulation for August 2006, August 2007, August 2008 and August 2009

I was asked by an overseas client to check out the circulation rate of SPH newspapers for a project. Interestingly, SPH have been showing the daily average SPH newspaper circulation for the month of August since 2006.

The PR community would love this figures for their clients.

  Aug-06 Aug-07 Aug-08 Aug-09 Aug 06 to Aug 09
Tamil Murasu 10,200 11,700 14,400 14,100 38%
The Business Times 30,400 34,500 35,700 38,300 26%
Shin Min Daily 122,600 116,600 139,600 136,500 11%
Berita Harihan 62,500 61,800 62,000 60,900 -3%
The Straits Times 388,500 387,800 389,300 374,500 -4%
Lianhe ZaoBao 183,000 174,500 176,000 174,500 -5%
The New Paper 111,400 110,800 109,300 104,900 -6%
The Sunday Times 402,600 384,500 382,200 371,900 -8%
Lianhe WanBao 123,900 122,400 107,200 101,900 -18%

Interestingly, the biggest gainers in terms of circulation from Aug 2006 to August 2009 is Tamil Murasu which grew 38%.

The Business Times saw its circulation grow to positive double figures of 26%.

However, it is the English papers that are seeing decline with The Sunday Times dropping by 8%.

My client went on to estimate that with a population of 4,839,396 and with taking an average of 40,000 new borns each year, there will be 840,000 below the age of 21.  So this means, only 8% of Singaporeans adults read The Straits Times.

This are just uneducated and rough estimations but my client did point out that, according to Nick Brucher, there are about 1,942,880 Facebook users from Singapore.

Go figure.



Anonymous said…
Circulation figures mean number of copies sold which does not equate to number of readers.

Each household buys 1 copy but read by X number of members?
Anonymous said…
Your client's calculation is flawed. So long as a person is literate, he can read the papers even if he is below 18. And most importantly a newspaper can be read by multiple readers. Even if there are more than 1 million facebook user, not everyone of them will be accessed everyday.

Popular posts from this blog

Why is Ramly Burger banned in Singapore?

Yahoo Singapore ran an article of the Ramly Burger by highlighting that it is ban in Singapore.

Yet, the writer from Makansutra failed to address the most important issue of why the Ramly meat patty is banned in Singapore.

A search online easily did highlight that the famous Malaysian meat patty is banned by the AVA but didn't go into details.

Wrote Arlina Arshad for The Straits Times in January 2004,

"But the importing of beef and beef products from Malaysia is not permitted, said theAgri-Food and Veterinary Authority (AVA).

Selling and supplying them without a permit is also an offence, and offenders can befined as much as $50,000 or jailed two years, or both, said the AVA."

In May of the same year, another article highlighted that a man was even charged in court for "smuggling" the Ramly burger in 2004.

"The AVA said that meat products processed in Malaysian food factories which it had notapproved were banned here.Suzali was yesterday jailed for four month…

Those Who Gamble Online Have Poorest Control - NCG Survey In 2012

Singapore will soon exempt local operators, Singapore Pools and Turf Club, from online gambling ban and the sites will be ready in November 2016.

Ministry of Home Affairs explained that a complete ban on remote gambling drives demand and activities underground, and may create larger incentives for criminal syndicates to target Singapore."

Yet in a 2012 survey by the National Council on Problem Gambling (NCG) found that those who gamble online have the poorest control.

For those who indulged in online gambling, 30.4% said they gambled for a longer period than they planned to, 33.3% gambled with more money than they planned and 29.2% gambled more frequently they planned to. 
Will launching the online gambling sites be like opening a Pandora Box that will create more issues in the future?

A Very Small Chicken Or An Oversized Popcorn Chicken?

Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC) Singapore Facebook Page recently received a complaint of the size of the chicken being served at KFC.

Barnabas Ng took a photo of his chicken from KFC which showed it to be almost the size of the KFC small container. It also looked like a an oversize popcorn chicken.

Wrote Barnabas,

"Hi KFC, is this your new standard size for a chicken? I order 3 piece meal and 2 pieces including this so called original recipe chicken is smaller than the size of the cap of ur small mash potato.

Have you guys try to cut cost so much that you are offering half a size chicken pieces for a full price meal? It is just getting from bad to worse"

KFC Singapore did reply to Barnabas for him to PM his mobile number but Barnabas has yet to receive any calls from KFC Singapore, as of this posting.

Maybe chickens are also shrinking with the current climate change?