Skip to main content

Did Lenovo Singapore Foursquare campaign work at Sitex 2010?

There was quite an excitement over Lenovo Singapore Foursquare campaign at the recently ended Sitex 2010. One Singapore blogger expected the promotion to cause a trend among Foursquare users in Singapore. Kudos to Singapore Lenovo to use Foursquare for SITEX.

Wrote DK,

Think this is the first time a company in Singapore uses Foursquare at a consumer IT exhibition like this. With such promotion, the Lenovo booth will most likely be trending every morning. Once the location is trending, other Foursquare users nearby will see the location in the trending list. It’s a good way to inform visitors the booth location. I wonder how is the success rate.

The campaign was rather simple. Check in to Lenovo’s Sitex booth on Foursquare and get a mystery gift. The first 30 check in daily would get a mystery prize. As such, I would assume that Lenovo Singapore was looking to get a total of 120 check ins over the four days of Sitex 2010.

image 

However, at the end of Sitex 2010, only 12 unique Foursquare users check in. Given that Fabian N. is a Lenovo staff, only 11 unique Foursquare users check in. As such 9.16% of the expected 120 check in was achieved.

Lenovo Singapore Facebook Page has about 1,593 fans and the Foursquare promotion was first updated on the wall a day before Sitex. With 11 unique Foursquare users check in and assuming that these 11 are fans of Lenovo Facebook Page, only 0.69% of the Facebook fans responded to the Foursquare campaign.

One possible reason for the low check in was probably due to bad 3G connection at SITEX, however, the irony here would have been that all the three major telcos Singtel, M1 and Starhub were probably showing off their 3G wares at SITEX.

Commented Lester Chan on DK’s blog post,

It is a little difficult to do that, it is impossible for me to get a data connection inside the hall!

The low check in could also mean that a majority of Singapore smartphone users are not that into Foursquare, yet.

When Fabian, the Lenovo employee, who check in, his Facebook wall was updated about his location at SITEX. Given that he has 800+ friends, it also showed that his friends were not responding to the Foursquare campaign either.

Lenovo Singapore could have made better use of their Facebook Page during SITEX. From their Facebook Page (http://www.facebook.com/Lenovo.SG), Lenovo Singapore were only looking to promote a copy of their SITEX ad and the Foursqaure campaign.

With the Facebook Page having 1,593 fans and assuming that each fan has an average of 150 friends, wouldn’t it be better if Lenovo Singapore updated the wall with the special pricing of their notebooks on promotion.

For example, the update would have just said “"Lenovo G460 at SGD899 (SGD500 off original price) at SITEX 2010. Visit Booth 4C-01”. A wall update like this would have populated more users wall and is easier to read and understand.

Some might overlook the ad by not clicking on the picture or may not have a Foursquare app on their mobile phone.

Lenovo Singapore should have also look at providing its 1,593 fans some sort of benefits at SITEX for being a fan. Maybe a fan recognised at the booth when making a purchase gets an additional SD card. This would have also given Lenovo Singapore the opportunity to do a drive at the booth to get more fans.

It is quite interesting that Lenovo Singapore chose to ignore the Fans on its Facebook Page and start another campaign on another social nework.

As a consumer brand, wouldn’t it be better to be communicating to 2,000 fans instead of 1,593?

This leads to the next point. If Lenovo Singapore had gathered 120 check in or more, what can it with that database?

The Foursquare venue of Lenovo Booth 4C01@ SITEX 2010 is only for SITEX 2010 . Unless Lenovo Singapore has decided to make Lenovo Booth 4C01 a permanent feature at SITEX, they would have just gather 120 check in and not be able to do something next year with the 120 check in.

A new booth at SITEX 2011 means Lenovo Singapore would means they would again have to start with a new venue on Foursquare and from 0 check in.

Comments

foursquare to show more privacy? lol

Popular posts from this blog

How UOB's Paper Trail Amplifies IT Greatest Security Threat

UOB required you to do everything on paper. If you want to change your mobile number for your banking account with them or for your credit card, you need to fill up a form. Yet, this paper trail represented a potential security fail for the bank - Human Error. So a bitcoin expert walked into UOB to open a bank account. The bank employee had to print a form from a online pdf document to fill in this bitcoin expert's particulars. When it came to entering the bitcoin expert's email, that's when the forgotten art of handwriting was the most obvious of the digital generation. Wrote Robert Capodieci, My name is Roberto Capodieci, as most of you know. and my email address is very obvious to decode. It is not a p4l_l337_s0u1@gmail.com, but it is a more obvious roberto@capodieci.com, thing that, right after reading my name in the same form, should come out easy. Still, a data entry personnel of the UOB bank (or of a service provider the UOB bank uses) entered it as roberto

NEL Train Fault Shouts Lack Of Crisis Communication

The North-East Line train fault of 11 April 2018 was my virgin experience of a rush hour train fault since I moved to Punggol. One would have thought that with the number of train faults experienced by the North-East Line operator, SBS Transit, they would have improved the communications and handling of train faults. However, my personal experience told another story. First, there were no announcements at the Punggol LRT stations of the train fault even though SBS Transit manages them. The train fault was reported as early as 7.10am as I had a friend who was also stuck in the train. I boarded the LRT at Coral Edge around 7.30am and I didn't hear of any announcement nor was there any signage to inform me o the train fault at Punggol Station. Second, the announcement kept saying that there would be a 15 minutes delay, but 15 minutes passed and the trains, on both side, wasn't moving. If the announcement would be more frank to say it will be a longer delay, commuters would

Singapore radio personality in "hot soup" for reporting train delays based on Tweets?

Update - Hossan Leong has commented on this post to say " I'm not in trouble pls don't blow this out of proportion. Let it rest. It's getting silly. Thank you for your love and concern and I apologize for any misunderstanding." ~  Hossan Leong. Hossan Leong, a Singapore radio personality for The Gold Breakfast Show on Gold 90.5, was censured today for reporting on train delays on the Circle Line because he based the information on Tweets, rather than waiting for the official reports from the Circle Line operator, SMRT.  It is, however, unknown if the "warning" came from Mediacorp producers or SMRT. Tweeted Hossan Leong ,  OK...I reported it on air and now I'm getting into trouble for it?? The CC line is DOWN rite? I did nothing wrong rite? The SMRT Circle Line was reported to be down this morning during peak hours and started as early as 7am. However, local news only received official statement was received by the mainstream media at about 9