Skip to main content

Get lost lah, Singapore Tourism Board!



Singapore Tourism Board, or STB, recently launched a "Get lost" visit Singapore advertisement that has led many Singaporean perplexed by the choice of words used to entice Australians to come visit this island state.

Wrote mrbrown,
I guess this was Singapore taking the piss at Australia for their "So where the bloody hell are you?" tourism campaign.
Though I am pretty certain "get lost" means the same in Australia as the rest of the world.
And with our tiny size, I am not sure if it is possible to get lost here either.

For those who feel that the "get lost" tagline is almost as cute as "So where the bloody hell are you", I would have to ask you when was the last time a Singaporean told you to get lost and meant it as an encouragement to go out and explore.

Also, if an Australian gets lost in Singapore, it is an insult to the efficient Singapore public transportation system and the hard work by the Land Transport Authority to marked every road and street with signs so nobody can get lost in Singapore.

Even if you reach the end of the road and see the sea, just make a u-turn and you will be back in a jiffy.

So to Singapore Tourism Board, get lost! I mean it as words of encouragement, really!

Comments

Anonymous said…
lol. i guess that's why the ad is not targetted at singaporeans/asians?

a lot of my aussie/ang moh friends/english educated friends actually use it in jest? the sense of humour is in general more sarcastic. just saying....
Aaron Koh said…
I agree it is not targeted at Singaporeans or Asians.

Even if it targeted at Aussie, us Singaporeans don't use the tagline "Get lost" at all... The context, got lost, in the messaging.

Most tourists would like to explore the country as it is or advertised the country as it is.. So Aussie say Bloody so often that us, tourists, expect them to say that when we visit Australia...

So when you show an ad of Singaporeans adopting an Aussie accent to say get lost to tourist, is that what the tourist expect from Singaporeans?
Cheap Hotels said…
ha nice article aaron!

Popular posts from this blog

Why is Ramly Burger banned in Singapore?

Yahoo Singapore ran an article of the Ramly Burger by highlighting that it is ban in Singapore.

Yet, the writer from Makansutra failed to address the most important issue of why the Ramly meat patty is banned in Singapore.

A search online easily did highlight that the famous Malaysian meat patty is banned by the AVA but didn't go into details.

Wrote Arlina Arshad for The Straits Times in January 2004,

"But the importing of beef and beef products from Malaysia is not permitted, said theAgri-Food and Veterinary Authority (AVA).

Selling and supplying them without a permit is also an offence, and offenders can befined as much as $50,000 or jailed two years, or both, said the AVA."

In May of the same year, another article highlighted that a man was even charged in court for "smuggling" the Ramly burger in 2004.


"The AVA said that meat products processed in Malaysian food factories which it had notapproved were banned here.Suzali was yesterday jailed for four month…

Social Media 101: How To Be The Most Hated Person In Singapore Instantly

It is amazing how we are quick to forget that a single wrong comment on social media can make one the most hated person in Singapore.

Back in 2012, we had Amy Cheong. Her comments on Facebook about a Malay wedding under her HDB void deck resulted in an online CSI that cost her her job.

Fast forward to 2017 and we have Thomas Chua Poh Heng and whose name will forever live in Internet infamy.



Thomas reposted a video of the funeral of a Traffic Policeman who died while on duty. Thomas then commented that his death was well deserve as Thomas was once given a traffic ticket by the same Traffic Policeman.

Even the Home Minister for Singapore, who is responsible for the Police Force, was offended by Thomas' statement.



The screenshot showed that post was marked global by the Globe image next to the Singapore tag which could hint that this post was meant for all to see. As such, the argument of a "private"post does not hold any weight here.

Just as expected, after this post was s…

Those Who Gamble Online Have Poorest Control - NCG Survey In 2012

Singapore will soon exempt local operators, Singapore Pools and Turf Club, from online gambling ban and the sites will be ready in November 2016.

Ministry of Home Affairs explained that a complete ban on remote gambling drives demand and activities underground, and may create larger incentives for criminal syndicates to target Singapore."

Yet in a 2012 survey by the National Council on Problem Gambling (NCG) found that those who gamble online have the poorest control.

 Source: https://app.msf.gov.sg/Portals/0/Summary/research/EDGD/Gambling%20participation%20survey%202011.pdf
For those who indulged in online gambling, 30.4% said they gambled for a longer period than they planned to, 33.3% gambled with more money than they planned and 29.2% gambled more frequently they planned to. 
Will launching the online gambling sites be like opening a Pandora Box that will create more issues in the future?