Skip to main content

The tweets of his death have been greatly exaggerated

Rumours of the death of Singapore's first Prime Minister days prior to Singapore's National Day were easily quashed when Mr Lee Kuan Yew appeared on "live" national TV attending the National Day Parade.

The Twitter rumour mill even got one journalist's mother calling her up to confirm the news. 

Wrote Eileen Yu of ZDNet
Lee, according to the Twitter rumor mill, had died earlier this week.
His supposedly death was a trending topic on Monday but went so viral on Wednesday even my mum called her reporter-daughter to check if Lee was indeed dead.
The rumors varied. One claimed he was brain-dead, while another alleged he was already dead and the country's national papers were instructed to hold back the news until after Singapore's birthday celebrations.
The Twitter community is out with a vengeance and is now trying to identify who started this rumour.

Though this wouldn't be classified as mass hysteria, this incident easily how a online rumour on a particular social network can literally turned into a literal word of mouth spread.

The medium too cannot be blamed for such a spread. Even in 1938, the American radio drama "War of the Worlds" created national wide panic with its "news bulletin" style format.

From that Wikipedia page, even when a radio host tried to calm his audience by saying " "The world is not coming to an end. Trust me. When have I ever lied to you?", some of the audience accused him of covering up the incident.

Tessa Wong, a journalist at The Straits Times, tweeted that a fellow journalist will be meeting Mr Lee but that didn't seem to calm the masses either.

Everybody was waiting for an official announcement from the Prime Minister's Office, but the best announcement came from the "live" presence of Mr Lee at the National Day Parade.

However, as the generation look at Tweets and social networks for news, it is more than important now that the related government agency should look at how to counter such rumours in future. Not by censoring or by punishment, but by being open and transparent source of information on social networks.

As such, the government could make use of the Twitter community to do what they do best, retweet the right information. 

Comments

Anonymous said…
Surely the government has better things to do with its time than address every random rumour that comes up, especially one as ridiculous as this. Shouldn't it be up to the people spreading the rumours to provide evidence, not the people being talked about?
Aaron Koh said…
As much as this Twitter rumour is ridiculous, even the journalist's mother called to check on the real issue at hand.

The biggest problem is that those spreading rumours, or those believe in the rumours do not evidence to believe if the rumours are true.

When social networks become mainstream to a generation, it becomes the medium that the government must be prepared for.

Popular posts from this blog

How UOB's Paper Trail Amplifies IT Greatest Security Threat

UOB required you to do everything on paper. If you want to change your mobile number for your banking account with them or for your credit card, you need to fill up a form. Yet, this paper trail represented a potential security fail for the bank - Human Error. So a bitcoin expert walked into UOB to open a bank account. The bank employee had to print a form from a online pdf document to fill in this bitcoin expert's particulars. When it came to entering the bitcoin expert's email, that's when the forgotten art of handwriting was the most obvious of the digital generation. Wrote Robert Capodieci, My name is Roberto Capodieci, as most of you know. and my email address is very obvious to decode. It is not a p4l_l337_s0u1@gmail.com, but it is a more obvious roberto@capodieci.com, thing that, right after reading my name in the same form, should come out easy. Still, a data entry personnel of the UOB bank (or of a service provider the UOB bank uses) entered it as roberto

NEL Train Fault Shouts Lack Of Crisis Communication

The North-East Line train fault of 11 April 2018 was my virgin experience of a rush hour train fault since I moved to Punggol. One would have thought that with the number of train faults experienced by the North-East Line operator, SBS Transit, they would have improved the communications and handling of train faults. However, my personal experience told another story. First, there were no announcements at the Punggol LRT stations of the train fault even though SBS Transit manages them. The train fault was reported as early as 7.10am as I had a friend who was also stuck in the train. I boarded the LRT at Coral Edge around 7.30am and I didn't hear of any announcement nor was there any signage to inform me o the train fault at Punggol Station. Second, the announcement kept saying that there would be a 15 minutes delay, but 15 minutes passed and the trains, on both side, wasn't moving. If the announcement would be more frank to say it will be a longer delay, commuters would

Singapore radio personality in "hot soup" for reporting train delays based on Tweets?

Update - Hossan Leong has commented on this post to say " I'm not in trouble pls don't blow this out of proportion. Let it rest. It's getting silly. Thank you for your love and concern and I apologize for any misunderstanding." ~  Hossan Leong. Hossan Leong, a Singapore radio personality for The Gold Breakfast Show on Gold 90.5, was censured today for reporting on train delays on the Circle Line because he based the information on Tweets, rather than waiting for the official reports from the Circle Line operator, SMRT.  It is, however, unknown if the "warning" came from Mediacorp producers or SMRT. Tweeted Hossan Leong ,  OK...I reported it on air and now I'm getting into trouble for it?? The CC line is DOWN rite? I did nothing wrong rite? The SMRT Circle Line was reported to be down this morning during peak hours and started as early as 7am. However, local news only received official statement was received by the mainstream media at about 9