Skip to main content

Why Food Blogger Daniel Ang is also responsible for the Diner en Blanc incident

I thought I played Devil's Advocate, take a step back and give another perspective on the whole Diner en Blanc social media fiasco.

From a blogging perspective, there are reasons why food blogger, Daniel Ang, should take some responsibility in this issue.

1. Did Daniel create a relationship with PR that deleting a post was perceived as a possibility?

In one of his post defending the PR agency, Daniel wrote "I cleared my content with the PR company (just to be safe) and they also thought the idea was fun and imaginative".

As Daniel highlighted that he "cleared" his article with the PR, wouldn't this mean that if the PR didn't clear his article, besides editing the article, he would also give the PR a choice to delete the article?

If you are a writer or journalist for a traditional mass media outlet, giving the PR company the final say in your article is no different from doing a advertorial. A blogger should also not let the PR company have the final say or editorial control of the final article.

As a blogger, writer or journalist, you write, not to make the PR happy, but to make your readers happy. As Winston Churchill said, "You have enemies? Good. That means you’ve stood up for something, sometime in your life".

If the PR or client is not happy with your article, it is their responsibility to respond accordingly, not ask for a take down.

2. Daniel didn't communicate his "white food" post as a joke clearly

The post that started the uproar about only "white food" allowed at Diner en Blanc was a joke as posted by Daniel. In this initial post, Daniel wrote, "Wanted to bring Snow White Milk Gelato but think it will melt before I reach there. Anyway, I am just kidding about the White Food part. You can any bring coloured-food, just no paper plates and disposables".

The title of the headline? "Dîner en Blanc is Coming to Singapore! What To Expect & What White Food To Bring."

Bold the words "white" or put it in open inverted commas. Put the word "joke" in italics or bold it. Do whatever it takes to ensure that your readers are aware of your "joke".

Even the organisers were so afraid that Daniel was actually encouraging his readers to bring "hawker white food" that they requested a take down.

As Dr Leslie Tay wrote in his blog "However, in his blog post, Daniel had suggested that the food needs to be white! (He had meant it as a joke - he said it at the end of the post) But in haste, the organizers told Daniel to remove the blog post so that it would not send the wrong message to other people coming to the event."

From this incident, it is clear that a post on a blog and the reactions to the post can become a national event. So as Uncle Ben said "With great power comes great responsibilities", bloggers, too, have a responsibility in what they blog about.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why is Ramly Burger banned in Singapore?

Yahoo Singapore ran an article of the Ramly Burger by highlighting that it is ban in Singapore.

Yet, the writer from Makansutra failed to address the most important issue of why the Ramly meat patty is banned in Singapore.

A search online easily did highlight that the famous Malaysian meat patty is banned by the AVA but didn't go into details.

Wrote Arlina Arshad for The Straits Times in January 2004,

"But the importing of beef and beef products from Malaysia is not permitted, said theAgri-Food and Veterinary Authority (AVA).

Selling and supplying them without a permit is also an offence, and offenders can befined as much as $50,000 or jailed two years, or both, said the AVA."

In May of the same year, another article highlighted that a man was even charged in court for "smuggling" the Ramly burger in 2004.


"The AVA said that meat products processed in Malaysian food factories which it had notapproved were banned here.Suzali was yesterday jailed for four month…

Those Who Gamble Online Have Poorest Control - NCG Survey In 2012

Singapore will soon exempt local operators, Singapore Pools and Turf Club, from online gambling ban and the sites will be ready in November 2016.

Ministry of Home Affairs explained that a complete ban on remote gambling drives demand and activities underground, and may create larger incentives for criminal syndicates to target Singapore."

Yet in a 2012 survey by the National Council on Problem Gambling (NCG) found that those who gamble online have the poorest control.

 Source: https://app.msf.gov.sg/Portals/0/Summary/research/EDGD/Gambling%20participation%20survey%202011.pdf
For those who indulged in online gambling, 30.4% said they gambled for a longer period than they planned to, 33.3% gambled with more money than they planned and 29.2% gambled more frequently they planned to. 
Will launching the online gambling sites be like opening a Pandora Box that will create more issues in the future?

Did She Run Or Did She "Just Fake It" For Adidas?

Andrea Chong, a Adidas appointed influencer, posted a photo of herself in the middle of the Standard Chartered Singapore Marathon 2015 and captioned how she was "all smiles" during the run.

Unfortunately for Andrea or the PR agency, one of her readers checked her bib number #75148  at the Marathon's website only to find it to belonging to somebody else.

That somebody else is Kuvin Kuar, a intern at Edelman PR and the bib number had a status "DNF" or did not finished.

This raised the first red flag as one of the rules stated that "A Participants is strictly not allowed to transfer his or her race entry to another party".

This cascaded into perceptions that Andrea herself did not even start or complete the race and was only "planted" by Adidas or the PR agency, Edelman PR, to look pretty in the marathon.

Marketing Magazine noted that Adidas declined to comment about the incident which lead to further speculation that Andrea was possibly just …