Skip to main content

Here is why PR agencies shouldn't just play postman for its clients

One of the lessons I learnt from a manager was that she didn't want me to just play postman, one who just delivers programs after programs. She wanted us to create, or work on to improve a system so we be seen as fire-starters rather than a "postman" at work.

Below is a REAL STORY on why PR agencies should also buck up and not play the role of "postman" for their clients.

Wrote a IT Journalist on Facebook,

"Journo: Hey I cant install any apps in the tablet u passed to me becoz I dont ha ve admin rights, can I have the admin password?

OS company: We cannot give you admin password, we have to reinstall for you

Three weeks later

OS company: Oh, we found out the problem, you didnt have admin rights.

Journo: Yah, that's what I told you three weeks ago and which is why you took the tablet back."

One of the important lessons learnt here is that when you send a product to a journalist or for a blogger review, make sure it is a full product which allows the journalist or blogger to test out everything.

If the executive at this PR agency had stepped out and tested the product before delivering it, the executive would have done a great deal to manage the media perception of the brand.

True that this didn't appear on the main papers, but with social networks being mainstream these days, what appears on Facebook, Twitter, etc can affect the friend's perception of the brand.

Like how one friend of the journo commented, "So they lost 3 weeks of time. Cutting edge to dull edge...".

The product review could have appeared earlier but now it is on hold indefinitely,or until this OS company find out what is the admin password. Maybe the product takes three weeks to uninstall and reinstall, too.

See how the damage to the brand's reputation can be done even if the story does not appear in main print.


Popular posts from this blog

Why is Ramly Burger banned in Singapore?

Yahoo Singapore ran an article of the Ramly Burger by highlighting that it is ban in Singapore.

Yet, the writer from Makansutra failed to address the most important issue of why the Ramly meat patty is banned in Singapore.

A search online easily did highlight that the famous Malaysian meat patty is banned by the AVA but didn't go into details.

Wrote Arlina Arshad for The Straits Times in January 2004,

"But the importing of beef and beef products from Malaysia is not permitted, said theAgri-Food and Veterinary Authority (AVA).

Selling and supplying them without a permit is also an offence, and offenders can befined as much as $50,000 or jailed two years, or both, said the AVA."

In May of the same year, another article highlighted that a man was even charged in court for "smuggling" the Ramly burger in 2004.

"The AVA said that meat products processed in Malaysian food factories which it had notapproved were banned here.Suzali was yesterday jailed for four month…

Those Who Gamble Online Have Poorest Control - NCG Survey In 2012

Singapore will soon exempt local operators, Singapore Pools and Turf Club, from online gambling ban and the sites will be ready in November 2016.

Ministry of Home Affairs explained that a complete ban on remote gambling drives demand and activities underground, and may create larger incentives for criminal syndicates to target Singapore."

Yet in a 2012 survey by the National Council on Problem Gambling (NCG) found that those who gamble online have the poorest control.

For those who indulged in online gambling, 30.4% said they gambled for a longer period than they planned to, 33.3% gambled with more money than they planned and 29.2% gambled more frequently they planned to. 
Will launching the online gambling sites be like opening a Pandora Box that will create more issues in the future?

A Very Small Chicken Or An Oversized Popcorn Chicken?

Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC) Singapore Facebook Page recently received a complaint of the size of the chicken being served at KFC.

Barnabas Ng took a photo of his chicken from KFC which showed it to be almost the size of the KFC small container. It also looked like a an oversize popcorn chicken.

Wrote Barnabas,

"Hi KFC, is this your new standard size for a chicken? I order 3 piece meal and 2 pieces including this so called original recipe chicken is smaller than the size of the cap of ur small mash potato.

Have you guys try to cut cost so much that you are offering half a size chicken pieces for a full price meal? It is just getting from bad to worse"

KFC Singapore did reply to Barnabas for him to PM his mobile number but Barnabas has yet to receive any calls from KFC Singapore, as of this posting.

Maybe chickens are also shrinking with the current climate change?