Skip to main content

Don't expect Lenovo's next business day warranty to be done next day

A complaint appeared on Leveno Singapore Facebook Page on how a user encountered countless problems with her one year old thinkpad x220. Despite having paid additional for Lenovo's next business day warranty, it took awhile for the user to get any service.

Wrote Jan Chia on Lenovo Singapore Facebook Page,

"I am so disappointed with my one year old thinkpad x220. Despite purchasing the next business day international warranty, I had to wait over a week to receive servicing. Sadly, the laptop has been serviced numerous times over the past year.

..  It's tiring to call customer service daily, I have given up."

Though Lenovo Singapore has forwarded her case to Lenovo Customer Care department,  there have been no updates from Lenovo as time of this published post.

As the admin of Lenovo Singapore requested openly for Jan's serial number, the details for her warranty are as follows:


System Info
Type: Model: Serial number:
4290 RS8 R9ED57E
- Base Warranty 
Status: Start date: Expiration date: Available days in warranty:
In warranty 6/24/11 6/23/14 601 days remaining
Description:
This product has a three year limited warranty and is entitled to mail-in or carry-in repair service.
- Upgraded Warranty 
Status: Start date: Expiration date: Available days in warranty:
In warranty 6/24/11 6/23/14 601 days remaining
Description:
This product has a three year limited warranty which includes a ThinkPlus warranty upgrade. This product is entitled to parts and labor and includes on-site repair service. Service is available Monday-Friday, exceptholidays, with a next business day response objective.

It seems Lenovo interpretation of next business day warranty is for the user to get a response by the next business day and it cost USD99 for two years.

A Google search has shown several posts about Lenovo's interpretation of next business day warranty.

Wrote Madduck,


"My understanding of the contract has always been that, assuming the problem requires on-site service, a technician gets in touch with you by the end of the next business day to agree on a time for the on-site visit. The contract does not guarantee that there will be a technician on-site on the next business day, but for two or three hundred Euros, that would be too much to ask.

However, it turns out that I assumed too much. First of all, Lenovo sells you a "next-business-day response time objective", meaning that they aim to respond by the end of the next business day, but (obviously) can't be held liable if they fail to do so. Apparently, they don't even have to provide a reason for missing the objective.

What's even more curious, however, is their interpretation of "response": the term stems from the time when operators would log calls and technicians then processed the queue. Nowadays, Lenovo prides itself with "skilled technicians resolving more than 30% of all problems already on the phone", so the technicians log the calls and then immediately respond to them.

According to Lenovo, it is thus completely acceptable and within the bounds of the contract if the phone technician logs a call on Thursday (and thus responds to it righ away), an the on-site technician calls to arrange for a visit on the following Tuesday, and the first available slot would be Friday — 6 business days after the call was logged."


Is it worth it to pay about USD99 to pay for just a next day business response objective?


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why is Ramly Burger banned in Singapore?

Yahoo Singapore ran an article of the Ramly Burger by highlighting that it is ban in Singapore.

Yet, the writer from Makansutra failed to address the most important issue of why the Ramly meat patty is banned in Singapore.

A search online easily did highlight that the famous Malaysian meat patty is banned by the AVA but didn't go into details.

Wrote Arlina Arshad for The Straits Times in January 2004,

"But the importing of beef and beef products from Malaysia is not permitted, said theAgri-Food and Veterinary Authority (AVA).

Selling and supplying them without a permit is also an offence, and offenders can befined as much as $50,000 or jailed two years, or both, said the AVA."

In May of the same year, another article highlighted that a man was even charged in court for "smuggling" the Ramly burger in 2004.


"The AVA said that meat products processed in Malaysian food factories which it had notapproved were banned here.Suzali was yesterday jailed for four month…

Did She Run Or Did She "Just Fake It" For Adidas?

Andrea Chong, a Adidas appointed influencer, posted a photo of herself in the middle of the Standard Chartered Singapore Marathon 2015 and captioned how she was "all smiles" during the run.

Unfortunately for Andrea or the PR agency, one of her readers checked her bib number #75148  at the Marathon's website only to find it to belonging to somebody else.

That somebody else is Kuvin Kuar, a intern at Edelman PR and the bib number had a status "DNF" or did not finished.

This raised the first red flag as one of the rules stated that "A Participants is strictly not allowed to transfer his or her race entry to another party".

This cascaded into perceptions that Andrea herself did not even start or complete the race and was only "planted" by Adidas or the PR agency, Edelman PR, to look pretty in the marathon.

Marketing Magazine noted that Adidas declined to comment about the incident which lead to further speculation that Andrea was possibly just …

Kudos To Huawei 2 Year Warranty For P9 Series

When it comes to smartphones, I think I am jinxed.

For my history of owning smartphones, every time it comes close to the end of the two year contract with my mobile service provider. This time round, it happened to my Huawei P9.

All of a sudden, the LCD screen sort of decolourised. I thought it was a temporary issue but the decolourisation lasted for a few hours. Then the nightmare began.

The touchscreen couldn't be touched. This made it the smartphone a brick.

I thought the Huawei P9 only had one year of warrant. With my contract ending in mid-year, I thought I would have to wait it out till the contract ended and allowed me to buy a new phone under a contract.

Luckily, a friend reminded me that the phone came with a 2 year warranty.

So I decided to go to the Huawei service center, right smack in the center of the city, to see if my phone is under warranty and if Huawei would honour their 2 year warranty.

Thankfully, Huawei isn't as popular as the Samsungs or Apples, and the …