Skip to main content

Singapore Town Councils' expenditure on PR, Advertising and Publicity

The recent reaction of Aljunied-Hougang Town Council's to the termination of AIMS financial computer services have put a spotlight on the Town Council's annual reports.

Alex Au of Yawning Bread blog has been scrutinising the Town Council's annual report on the amount paid to AIMS for the financial computer service. You can read Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3 here.

Computing services falls under General and Administrative Expenditure section and it was interesting to see that Advertising, PR and Publicity is sometimes one of the highest expenditure spent, yet, details of such expenditure is not to be found.

Expenditure on Public Relations, Advertising and Publicity 2010 2011 2012
Ang Mo Kio  - Yio Chu Kang  $          352,401  $        620,520  
Bishan - Toa Payoh Town Council  $          213,078  $        513,397  
Hougang Town Council    $          20,733  
Chua Chu Kang Town Council (Hong Kah Town Council)  $          166,634  $        318,717  $        265,418
East Coast Town Council  $          271,763  $        253,997  $        303,484
Jurong Town Council  $          274,913  $        424,164  $        480,190
Marine Parade Town Council  $          267,890  $        363,722  $        270,726
Mouleim - Kallang Town Council    $        105,118  
Pasir Ris - Sengkang    $        280,220  $        204,259
Potong Pasir  $               3,797  $            9,014  $            8,630
Tanjong Pagar Town Council  $          284,102  $        423,643  $        322,980
West Coast Town Council    $        320,726  $        255,430

Some of the fields that are left empty because the information is not available. Tampines Town Council website was completely inaccessible as Google highlighted that the site could have malicious content.

The opposition wards of Hougang and Potong Pasir in 2011 spent the least in this section, $20,733 and $9,014 respectively.

Interestingly, most of the expenditure saw increase in the 2011 annual reports which ended in workyear 31 March 2011. Interesting because the General Elections of 2011 were held two months later in May 2011.

It would be interesting to see the ratio of expenditure on Public Relations, Advertising and Publicity.


Popular posts from this blog

Why is Ramly Burger banned in Singapore?

Yahoo Singapore ran an article of the Ramly Burger by highlighting that it is ban in Singapore.

Yet, the writer from Makansutra failed to address the most important issue of why the Ramly meat patty is banned in Singapore.

A search online easily did highlight that the famous Malaysian meat patty is banned by the AVA but didn't go into details.

Wrote Arlina Arshad for The Straits Times in January 2004,

"But the importing of beef and beef products from Malaysia is not permitted, said theAgri-Food and Veterinary Authority (AVA).

Selling and supplying them without a permit is also an offence, and offenders can befined as much as $50,000 or jailed two years, or both, said the AVA."

In May of the same year, another article highlighted that a man was even charged in court for "smuggling" the Ramly burger in 2004.

"The AVA said that meat products processed in Malaysian food factories which it had notapproved were banned here.Suzali was yesterday jailed for four month…

Social Media 101: How To Be The Most Hated Person In Singapore Instantly

It is amazing how we are quick to forget that a single wrong comment on social media can make one the most hated person in Singapore.

Back in 2012, we had Amy Cheong. Her comments on Facebook about a Malay wedding under her HDB void deck resulted in an online CSI that cost her her job.

Fast forward to 2017 and we have Thomas Chua Poh Heng and whose name will forever live in Internet infamy.

Thomas reposted a video of the funeral of a Traffic Policeman who died while on duty. Thomas then commented that his death was well deserve as Thomas was once given a traffic ticket by the same Traffic Policeman.

Even the Home Minister for Singapore, who is responsible for the Police Force, was offended by Thomas' statement.

The screenshot showed that post was marked global by the Globe image next to the Singapore tag which could hint that this post was meant for all to see. As such, the argument of a "private"post does not hold any weight here.

Just as expected, after this post was s…

Those Who Gamble Online Have Poorest Control - NCG Survey In 2012

Singapore will soon exempt local operators, Singapore Pools and Turf Club, from online gambling ban and the sites will be ready in November 2016.

Ministry of Home Affairs explained that a complete ban on remote gambling drives demand and activities underground, and may create larger incentives for criminal syndicates to target Singapore."

Yet in a 2012 survey by the National Council on Problem Gambling (NCG) found that those who gamble online have the poorest control.

For those who indulged in online gambling, 30.4% said they gambled for a longer period than they planned to, 33.3% gambled with more money than they planned and 29.2% gambled more frequently they planned to. 
Will launching the online gambling sites be like opening a Pandora Box that will create more issues in the future?