Skip to main content

2013 - A different AIM of finding news

As I was reading the The AIMS-Town Council issues via the blogs, it hit upon me that the way we search and consumed our news has totally change. Thanks to both technology and non-technological reasons.

Dr Teo Ho Pin released his 26 paragraph rebuttal as a press release and Facebook Post

Before Facebook, before Internet, one had to wait for the print media to report on releases. Radio and TV had the upper hand as they could release it earlier on air.

But now, the release is made via a Facebook Post where everyone can like, share and comment. In doing any of this three, the news would be easily spread from friend to friend.

Back then, without the Internet, the only way to share the news was to pass the newspaper to a friend. There would be coffee shop talk but comments usually disperse at the speed of sound.

Newspaper report, bloggers analyse 

This is where the local newspaper struggle. I believe there are some journalists who would like to go deeper into the story and provide a more critical analysis of the issue. Unfortunately, self-censorship and censorship within the print publication are preventing these journalists to take that extra step.

In fact, I was thinking of which blog to visit to get their analysis, not just reporting, of the new rebuttals. Should I visit Yawning Bread first and next Lucky Tan. Or maybe I should just wait for Singaporedaily.net to highlight their daily links.

One of the more interesting take on the issue came from a link shared by Singaporedaily.net - Harish Pillay's emotional comments on the rebuttal.

Yes, I do know the names of the editorial team at Digital Life as I occasionally still pitch to them. But as a reader,  not a single SPH journalist's name popped to my head.

Here's the problem for The Straits Times. The Internet Generation can recall which blog to visit by their name, and not that of any SPH Journalists. You need that top of mind recall to bring back readers.

Traditionally, the soft advertisements pay for the hard news. But when hard news get commoditise and you can get your news every where and any where, when even the newsmakers can bypass the gatekeepers and put in their medium at their own time, when sharing a news is done easily with a simple like or share, the hard news needs to provide a value add to the reader.

If the value add is deterred by self and internal censorship, can you blame the Internet for falling subscriptions?


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why is Ramly Burger banned in Singapore?

Yahoo Singapore ran an article of the Ramly Burger by highlighting that it is ban in Singapore.

Yet, the writer from Makansutra failed to address the most important issue of why the Ramly meat patty is banned in Singapore.

A search online easily did highlight that the famous Malaysian meat patty is banned by the AVA but didn't go into details.

Wrote Arlina Arshad for The Straits Times in January 2004,

"But the importing of beef and beef products from Malaysia is not permitted, said theAgri-Food and Veterinary Authority (AVA).

Selling and supplying them without a permit is also an offence, and offenders can befined as much as $50,000 or jailed two years, or both, said the AVA."

In May of the same year, another article highlighted that a man was even charged in court for "smuggling" the Ramly burger in 2004.


"The AVA said that meat products processed in Malaysian food factories which it had notapproved were banned here.Suzali was yesterday jailed for four month…

Social Media 101: How To Be The Most Hated Person In Singapore Instantly

It is amazing how we are quick to forget that a single wrong comment on social media can make one the most hated person in Singapore.

Back in 2012, we had Amy Cheong. Her comments on Facebook about a Malay wedding under her HDB void deck resulted in an online CSI that cost her her job.

Fast forward to 2017 and we have Thomas Chua Poh Heng and whose name will forever live in Internet infamy.



Thomas reposted a video of the funeral of a Traffic Policeman who died while on duty. Thomas then commented that his death was well deserve as Thomas was once given a traffic ticket by the same Traffic Policeman.

Even the Home Minister for Singapore, who is responsible for the Police Force, was offended by Thomas' statement.



The screenshot showed that post was marked global by the Globe image next to the Singapore tag which could hint that this post was meant for all to see. As such, the argument of a "private"post does not hold any weight here.

Just as expected, after this post was s…

Those Who Gamble Online Have Poorest Control - NCG Survey In 2012

Singapore will soon exempt local operators, Singapore Pools and Turf Club, from online gambling ban and the sites will be ready in November 2016.

Ministry of Home Affairs explained that a complete ban on remote gambling drives demand and activities underground, and may create larger incentives for criminal syndicates to target Singapore."

Yet in a 2012 survey by the National Council on Problem Gambling (NCG) found that those who gamble online have the poorest control.

 Source: https://app.msf.gov.sg/Portals/0/Summary/research/EDGD/Gambling%20participation%20survey%202011.pdf
For those who indulged in online gambling, 30.4% said they gambled for a longer period than they planned to, 33.3% gambled with more money than they planned and 29.2% gambled more frequently they planned to. 
Will launching the online gambling sites be like opening a Pandora Box that will create more issues in the future?