Skip to main content

To make Google+ popular, Google should start looking at the merchants

Google received some bad news about its social network, Google+, from Gigya - only 2% saw Google+ has the key destination for shared contents. In comparison, Facebook scored 50% and Pinterest scored 16%.

Source: Gigya

This low percentage score means that its users are not sharing content on Google+. No content on Google+ means there is no reason for its 359 million users to visit Google+.

Google should relook at how it is going to make this social networks popular. My suggestion is that it should start from the merchants' angle rather than from the end-users' point of view.

Why do I say this? From my daily engagement with merchants on the ground, merchants, big or small, are starting Facebook Pages first and web-sites later. Discussions often start with "How many likes can I get" and no longer "How many visitors come to my site?".

A Cafe Celebrating Likes Than Visitors to the shop...
Merchants are starting Facebook Pages first because it extremely easy to do so. All the merchants need to do is go to https://www.facebook.com/pages, filling up a few fields and viola, they have a Facebook Page. If you are first time user of Facebook Page, you could even get a vanity URL instantly or wait till your Page get 25 Likes.

If merchants need to advertise on Facebook to get more Likes or increase awareness of the Page, merchants only need to go to http://Facebook.com/ads or just click any of the pop-ups on the Page screen targeted at admins to get advertise on the social platform.

Now, compare this to Google+. To get a vanity URL for the Google+ page, merchants first need to embed the Google+ button on its website and submit a verification form which requires a scan copy of some proof of document. Given that websites are now the number two or three thing to do before setting up a Facebook Page, why would merchants care about setting a Google+ Page?

If merchants need to advertise, they have to go outside of the Google+ Page to the Google Adwords page and find out how to advertise.

Google+ Pages don't even provide analytics for the Google+ Page direct and I am not even sure how you embed a Google Analytics code into a Google+ Page. For Facebook, once you reach 100 likes or more, Insights is provided naturally.

So for Google to make Google+ something that merchants want to use, Google should start making it easier for merchants to do things on Google+ and all within Google+, rather than go to multiple sites.

For a start, why don't Google make it easier for merchants to get vanity url?






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How UOB's Paper Trail Amplifies IT Greatest Security Threat

UOB required you to do everything on paper. If you want to change your mobile number for your banking account with them or for your credit card, you need to fill up a form. Yet, this paper trail represented a potential security fail for the bank - Human Error. So a bitcoin expert walked into UOB to open a bank account. The bank employee had to print a form from a online pdf document to fill in this bitcoin expert's particulars. When it came to entering the bitcoin expert's email, that's when the forgotten art of handwriting was the most obvious of the digital generation. Wrote Robert Capodieci, My name is Roberto Capodieci, as most of you know. and my email address is very obvious to decode. It is not a p4l_l337_s0u1@gmail.com, but it is a more obvious roberto@capodieci.com, thing that, right after reading my name in the same form, should come out easy. Still, a data entry personnel of the UOB bank (or of a service provider the UOB bank uses) entered it as roberto

NEL Train Fault Shouts Lack Of Crisis Communication

The North-East Line train fault of 11 April 2018 was my virgin experience of a rush hour train fault since I moved to Punggol. One would have thought that with the number of train faults experienced by the North-East Line operator, SBS Transit, they would have improved the communications and handling of train faults. However, my personal experience told another story. First, there were no announcements at the Punggol LRT stations of the train fault even though SBS Transit manages them. The train fault was reported as early as 7.10am as I had a friend who was also stuck in the train. I boarded the LRT at Coral Edge around 7.30am and I didn't hear of any announcement nor was there any signage to inform me o the train fault at Punggol Station. Second, the announcement kept saying that there would be a 15 minutes delay, but 15 minutes passed and the trains, on both side, wasn't moving. If the announcement would be more frank to say it will be a longer delay, commuters would

Singapore radio personality in "hot soup" for reporting train delays based on Tweets?

Update - Hossan Leong has commented on this post to say " I'm not in trouble pls don't blow this out of proportion. Let it rest. It's getting silly. Thank you for your love and concern and I apologize for any misunderstanding." ~  Hossan Leong. Hossan Leong, a Singapore radio personality for The Gold Breakfast Show on Gold 90.5, was censured today for reporting on train delays on the Circle Line because he based the information on Tweets, rather than waiting for the official reports from the Circle Line operator, SMRT.  It is, however, unknown if the "warning" came from Mediacorp producers or SMRT. Tweeted Hossan Leong ,  OK...I reported it on air and now I'm getting into trouble for it?? The CC line is DOWN rite? I did nothing wrong rite? The SMRT Circle Line was reported to be down this morning during peak hours and started as early as 7am. However, local news only received official statement was received by the mainstream media at about 9