Skip to main content

Should retailers give instant discounts or loyalty rewards to customers?

The work at Taggo requires me to go around talking to retailers. The common question I get from retailers is that should they provide instant discounts or offer loyalty rewards to their customers?

A quick survey on Facebook showed that 17 of my friends prefer instant rewards opposed to two who said they would like the retailer to reward them on their fifth visit.


You can take the survey at

The cost of providing the loyalty reward is no different from offering an instant discount. 

Let's take a SGD5 mug of coffee for example. Say you return to the coffee shop after your 5th time to collect the free mug of coffee, you would have spend SGD25 at the coffee shop. So the free sixth cup of SGD5 coffee would out to a 20% discount from the retailer.  That would be the same if the coffee shop gave 20% upfront. 

Sub-consciously, most consumer will do the maths and ask themselves and ask, "Why can't I have the 20% now instead of having to collect it after my 5th visit?". This itself defeats the purpose of loyalty.

However, we found that most customers would appreciate that the store gave the discount immediately. 

For the consumer, it is easier to remember that this shop gives 20% discount than to remember how many more visits do one need in order to claim that free cup of coffee. 

If the shops were to give 20% discount upon instant purchase, it is only fair that the shops get something in return. This is done usually when the shops ask their customers to join their VIP club or Fan Club. 

Most of the success we have at Taggo with the shops are those who give straightforward discounts with no other messy qualifiers to enjoy the discounts. All they need is to join the shops' fan club and get the cashier to check them in. 

Customers get the discount, the shops get new fans plus a wall post and sponsored stories which advertises the check-in for all the customers' friends to see.

We do discourage shops to put in messy qualifiers, like giving the discount after multiple visits or benefits that only occur at certain times/date, for customers to enjoy instant discount as these qualifiers can be perceived by customers to be put in place to prevent them, the customers, to enjoy the discounts in the first place. 

Customers today are spoilt by the Internet and Facebook where they can get instant results and gratification. Why shouldn't this instant gratification be awarded to customers too?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How UOB's Paper Trail Amplifies IT Greatest Security Threat

UOB required you to do everything on paper. If you want to change your mobile number for your banking account with them or for your credit card, you need to fill up a form. Yet, this paper trail represented a potential security fail for the bank - Human Error. So a bitcoin expert walked into UOB to open a bank account. The bank employee had to print a form from a online pdf document to fill in this bitcoin expert's particulars. When it came to entering the bitcoin expert's email, that's when the forgotten art of handwriting was the most obvious of the digital generation. Wrote Robert Capodieci, My name is Roberto Capodieci, as most of you know. and my email address is very obvious to decode. It is not a p4l_l337_s0u1@gmail.com, but it is a more obvious roberto@capodieci.com, thing that, right after reading my name in the same form, should come out easy. Still, a data entry personnel of the UOB bank (or of a service provider the UOB bank uses) entered it as roberto

NEL Train Fault Shouts Lack Of Crisis Communication

The North-East Line train fault of 11 April 2018 was my virgin experience of a rush hour train fault since I moved to Punggol. One would have thought that with the number of train faults experienced by the North-East Line operator, SBS Transit, they would have improved the communications and handling of train faults. However, my personal experience told another story. First, there were no announcements at the Punggol LRT stations of the train fault even though SBS Transit manages them. The train fault was reported as early as 7.10am as I had a friend who was also stuck in the train. I boarded the LRT at Coral Edge around 7.30am and I didn't hear of any announcement nor was there any signage to inform me o the train fault at Punggol Station. Second, the announcement kept saying that there would be a 15 minutes delay, but 15 minutes passed and the trains, on both side, wasn't moving. If the announcement would be more frank to say it will be a longer delay, commuters would

Singapore radio personality in "hot soup" for reporting train delays based on Tweets?

Update - Hossan Leong has commented on this post to say " I'm not in trouble pls don't blow this out of proportion. Let it rest. It's getting silly. Thank you for your love and concern and I apologize for any misunderstanding." ~  Hossan Leong. Hossan Leong, a Singapore radio personality for The Gold Breakfast Show on Gold 90.5, was censured today for reporting on train delays on the Circle Line because he based the information on Tweets, rather than waiting for the official reports from the Circle Line operator, SMRT.  It is, however, unknown if the "warning" came from Mediacorp producers or SMRT. Tweeted Hossan Leong ,  OK...I reported it on air and now I'm getting into trouble for it?? The CC line is DOWN rite? I did nothing wrong rite? The SMRT Circle Line was reported to be down this morning during peak hours and started as early as 7am. However, local news only received official statement was received by the mainstream media at about 9