Skip to main content

Should retailers give instant discounts or loyalty rewards to customers?

The work at Taggo requires me to go around talking to retailers. The common question I get from retailers is that should they provide instant discounts or offer loyalty rewards to their customers?

A quick survey on Facebook showed that 17 of my friends prefer instant rewards opposed to two who said they would like the retailer to reward them on their fifth visit.


You can take the survey at

The cost of providing the loyalty reward is no different from offering an instant discount. 

Let's take a SGD5 mug of coffee for example. Say you return to the coffee shop after your 5th time to collect the free mug of coffee, you would have spend SGD25 at the coffee shop. So the free sixth cup of SGD5 coffee would out to a 20% discount from the retailer.  That would be the same if the coffee shop gave 20% upfront. 

Sub-consciously, most consumer will do the maths and ask themselves and ask, "Why can't I have the 20% now instead of having to collect it after my 5th visit?". This itself defeats the purpose of loyalty.

However, we found that most customers would appreciate that the store gave the discount immediately. 

For the consumer, it is easier to remember that this shop gives 20% discount than to remember how many more visits do one need in order to claim that free cup of coffee. 

If the shops were to give 20% discount upon instant purchase, it is only fair that the shops get something in return. This is done usually when the shops ask their customers to join their VIP club or Fan Club. 

Most of the success we have at Taggo with the shops are those who give straightforward discounts with no other messy qualifiers to enjoy the discounts. All they need is to join the shops' fan club and get the cashier to check them in. 

Customers get the discount, the shops get new fans plus a wall post and sponsored stories which advertises the check-in for all the customers' friends to see.

We do discourage shops to put in messy qualifiers, like giving the discount after multiple visits or benefits that only occur at certain times/date, for customers to enjoy instant discount as these qualifiers can be perceived by customers to be put in place to prevent them, the customers, to enjoy the discounts in the first place. 

Customers today are spoilt by the Internet and Facebook where they can get instant results and gratification. Why shouldn't this instant gratification be awarded to customers too?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why is Ramly Burger banned in Singapore?

Yahoo Singapore ran an article of the Ramly Burger by highlighting that it is ban in Singapore.

Yet, the writer from Makansutra failed to address the most important issue of why the Ramly meat patty is banned in Singapore.

A search online easily did highlight that the famous Malaysian meat patty is banned by the AVA but didn't go into details.

Wrote Arlina Arshad for The Straits Times in January 2004,

"But the importing of beef and beef products from Malaysia is not permitted, said theAgri-Food and Veterinary Authority (AVA).

Selling and supplying them without a permit is also an offence, and offenders can befined as much as $50,000 or jailed two years, or both, said the AVA."

In May of the same year, another article highlighted that a man was even charged in court for "smuggling" the Ramly burger in 2004.


"The AVA said that meat products processed in Malaysian food factories which it had notapproved were banned here.Suzali was yesterday jailed for four month…

Social Media 101: How To Be The Most Hated Person In Singapore Instantly

It is amazing how we are quick to forget that a single wrong comment on social media can make one the most hated person in Singapore.

Back in 2012, we had Amy Cheong. Her comments on Facebook about a Malay wedding under her HDB void deck resulted in an online CSI that cost her her job.

Fast forward to 2017 and we have Thomas Chua Poh Heng and whose name will forever live in Internet infamy.



Thomas reposted a video of the funeral of a Traffic Policeman who died while on duty. Thomas then commented that his death was well deserve as Thomas was once given a traffic ticket by the same Traffic Policeman.

Even the Home Minister for Singapore, who is responsible for the Police Force, was offended by Thomas' statement.



The screenshot showed that post was marked global by the Globe image next to the Singapore tag which could hint that this post was meant for all to see. As such, the argument of a "private"post does not hold any weight here.

Just as expected, after this post was s…

Those Who Gamble Online Have Poorest Control - NCG Survey In 2012

Singapore will soon exempt local operators, Singapore Pools and Turf Club, from online gambling ban and the sites will be ready in November 2016.

Ministry of Home Affairs explained that a complete ban on remote gambling drives demand and activities underground, and may create larger incentives for criminal syndicates to target Singapore."

Yet in a 2012 survey by the National Council on Problem Gambling (NCG) found that those who gamble online have the poorest control.

 Source: https://app.msf.gov.sg/Portals/0/Summary/research/EDGD/Gambling%20participation%20survey%202011.pdf
For those who indulged in online gambling, 30.4% said they gambled for a longer period than they planned to, 33.3% gambled with more money than they planned and 29.2% gambled more frequently they planned to. 
Will launching the online gambling sites be like opening a Pandora Box that will create more issues in the future?